# Shortest Proof Game (SPG)

Glossary

*Shortest proof games* (SPG's) are simply
proof games with the smallest possible number
of moves.

Another name for SPG's is *Help games* because both Wh. and
Bl. cooperate to reach a given position in a given number of moves.
Thus the following three stipulations are almost equivalent: "*SPG
in 11.5 moves*", "*Help Game in 11.5 moves*" and "*Position
after Wh. 12th. Game score?*". The only difference is that the 1st
stipulation tells you that, really, no shorter proof game exists. (In
the 80's, many SPG's where given without a number of move, so that the
stipulation was simply "*Shortest proof game?*".)

This kind of problem is very popular today. Of course the construction
is really interesting if the (shortest) help game is unique, i.e.
*dual-free*, and if an artistic and/or problematic element is
present, e.g.

- The shortest proof game is paradoxical and involves apparently slow-moving
maneuvers, e.g. King castling and going back to its original square,
or
- It displays a specific motif, e.g. Phoenix promotions, or
- It is especially hard to discover, or
- It sets a new record, e.g. a length record.

Here is a simple (?) example:

**Ernest Clement Mortimer**

Shortest Proof Games, 1991

Version by A. Frolkin

15+13. Position after Black's 4th move.
How did the game go?

A compilation of SPGs has been published
by G. Wilts and A. Frolkin.

It contains a short history of the genre: Sam Loyd was the first to
ask for SPGs when he demonstrated that, starting from the initial position,
it is possible to capture all 30 men in just 34 single moves. [G. Ponzetti
showed in 1999 that it's possible to reach the positions Kf2/Ke7 and
Kf2/Kf7 in just 16.5 moves] Then T. R. Dawson proposed the first dual-free
SPG in 1913. It is only in the late 70s-early 80s that Michel Caillaud
demonstrated that long, dual-free, SPGs which a rich thematic content
could be composed. Since then, the genre has been very lively.

## Natch

Natch is a computer program for solving SPGs. It has been written
by Pascal Wassong <pascal.wassong(at)free.fr> and is freely available
in the Internet. It is
very helpful for composers searching for cooks.

Some "*help game*" problems do not ask for a given final position
but rather for given moves which must be present in the game. Here is
a simple (but very nice) example:

3510 - **Rösler, Peter**

Problemkiste, 08/1994

16+16. Find a game with **6. Pg7xf8=N
mate**

*One-sided proof games* are proof games were only one side,
i.e. White, plays. Thus we get some hybrid cross of the usual SPG with
the *series-mover* problem. Here is a nice example. Notice that,
like all such problems, it has 16 white units!

8732 - **Goran Wicklund**

Springaren 69, May 1997

16+9. One-sided proof game in 34 moves