Home | Raetsel | Gedichte | Schach | Retros | Wienerisch | Blog | Events

Retrograde Analysis

Diskussionen über Retroanalyse im Schach, sowohl über die Aufgaben auf unserer Web-Site als auch im Allgemeinen.

Moderatoren: Angela, Otto

Retrograde Analysis

Beitragvon faelanstevie » 26.02.2018 09:36

HI,
I'm working through 'The Chess Mysteries of Sherlock Holmes' by Raymond Smullyan and have come acrosss a problem for which I can see no solution although the book, whilst explaining most steps, offers the solution including the part-sentence 'It must have been from a4'. The problem is a question of whether Black can castle, and the problem is entitled 'You really can't, you know!'. If anyone has the book, can they please explain why pawn a3 MUST have come from a4 NOT b4. With this understanding the solution is clear, however I can't see why the pawn couldn't have come from b4 taking a black piece on a3 which would mean that the solution to the problem is different from as published.any idea.?
Thanks

I did not find the right solution from the internet.
References:
http://www.chessexchange.com/forum/view ... =29&t=4210
Animated Explainer Video
faelanstevie
 
Beiträge: 1
Registriert: 01.02.2018 15:08

Re: Retrograde Analysis

Beitragvon Otto » 27.02.2018 22:19

Please tell me the number of the problem in this list:
https://www.janko.at/Schach/Smullyan-SH/index.htm
Otto
Site Admin
 
Beiträge: 1922
Registriert: 07.08.2004 15:17
Wohnort: Wien

Re: Retrograde Analysis

Beitragvon wan the man » 04.01.2019 14:10

Indeed "You really can't, you know!" in Smullyan's chess mysteries of Sherlock Holmes is flawed, because the black pawn on a3 could have come from b4. A game can be constructed that reaches the given position while black can still castle.

An easy fix is to require that the last move from white was with the bishop (instead of the knight).
wan the man
 
Beiträge: 1
Registriert: 03.01.2019 19:01


Zurück zu Retroanalyse im Schach

Wer ist online?

Mitglieder in diesem Forum: 0 Mitglieder und 0 Gäste